Describe three significant court cases that have had an impact on the practice of probation and parole since the 1970s
What will be an ideal response?
Samson v. California (2006): Police officers may conduct a warrantless search of a person who is subject to a parole search condition, even when there is no suspicion of criminal wrongdoing and even when the sole reason for the search is that the person is on parole.
U.S. v. Knights (2001): The warrantless search authority normally reserved for probation and parole officers extends to police officers when supported by reasonable suspicion and authorized by the conditions of probation.
Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole v. Scott (1998):The exclusionary rule does not apply to searches by parole officers, even where such searchesyield evidence of parole violations.
Griffin v. Wisconsin (1987): Probation officers may conduct searches of a probationer's residence without the need for a search warrant or probable cause.
Minnesota v. Murphy (1984): A probationer's incriminating statements to a probation officer may be used as evidence against him or her if the probationer does not specifically claim a right against self-incrimination.
You might also like to view...
Which word or phrase below means: deeply embedded system of societal structure whereby people are organized according to how much status and power they have?
a. low context communication b. high context communication c. hierarchy d. profiling
The concept of precedent, central to Supreme Court decision making, is based on which legal principle?
A) Ex post facto B) Ad hoc facto C) Deus ex machina D) Stare decisis
Inchoate offenses are incomplete crimes
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
In the 1984 United States Supreme Court case New Jersey v. T.L.O. the court ruled that students were protected against unreasonable searches and seizures, but that school personnel are not bound by the same restrictions as police officers
Indicate whether the statement is true or false