Why might trade barriers be a highly ineffective technique for increasing domestic employment?
What will be an ideal response?
First, trade barriers lower living standards by making consumer goods more expensive. This means that consumers have less to spend on everything including domestic goods. Second, trade barriers invite retaliation that can hurt our exports and those employed in export industries. Even without retaliation, in the long run exports are hurt as foreigners have fewer dollars to spend on American goods since their imports to the U.S. have declined. Third, barriers limit the advantages to be gained by specializing in production where costs are relatively lower and prevent attaining the lower costs which specialization allows.
If the world has a more efficient allocation of resources and a higher level of material well-being as a result of free trade, it follows that in the long run barriers would reduce output and incomes throughout the world. A nation can have full employment with or without free trade, but without free trade workers will be employed less productively and their incomes will be lower.
You might also like to view...
If investment spending increases by $1 million, then the aggregate demand curve shifts
A) rightward by less than $1 million. B) leftward by more than $1 million. C) rightward by more than $1 million. D) rightward by $1 million. E) leftward by less than $1 million.
Suppose we have an economy in which G = 1100, t = 0.26, Y = 3800, and YN = 4000. The natural employment deficit is
A) 60. B) 200. C) 840. D) 286. E) -112.
Fractional reserve banking refers to a system in which the depository institution
A) holds reserves equal to its deposits. B) holds reserves greater than its deposits. C) holds reserves less than its deposits. D) holds zero reserves.
Which of the following does not hinder successful price leadership?
a. all of the following are correct b. potentially large economic profits due to this activity c. cheating by offering secret discounts d. product differentiation e. illegality of coordinated pricing