Discuss the history of Apple's and Samsung's patent battle against each other
What will be an ideal response?
In 2011, Apple sued Samsung for violating its patents for iPhones, iPads, and iPods. On August 24, 2012, a California jury in federal district court delivered a decisive victory to Apple and a stunning defeat to Samsung. The jury awarded Apple $1 billion in damages. The decision established criteria for determining just how close a competitor can come to an industry-leading and standard-setting product like Apple's iPhone before it violates the design and utility patents of the leading firm. The same court ruled that Samsung could not sell its new tablet computer (Galaxy 10.1 ) in the United States. In a later patent dispute, Samsung won an infringement case against Apple. In June 2013, the United States International Trade Commission issued a ban for a handful of older iPhone and iPad devices because they violated Samsung patents from years ago. In 2014, Apple sued Samsung again, claiming infringement of five patents. The patents cover hardware and software techniques for handling photos, videos, and lists used on the popular Galaxy 5. Apple sought $2 billion in damages. In 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals reaffirmed that Samsung had copied specific design patents, but dropped the damages Apple was granted to $930 million. To make matters more complicated, Apple has been one of Samsung's largest customers for flash memory processors, graphic chips, solid-state drives, and display parts that are used in Apple's iPhones, iPads, iPod Touch devices, and MacBooks. The Samsung and Apple patent cases are indicative of the complex relationships among the leading computer firms.
You might also like to view...
An auditor noticed that company B had an exorbitant increase in sales and drastic decreases in its inventory and accounts receivables. The above statement symbolizes which fraud symptom?
a. Accounting anomaly b. Internal control weakness c. Analytical anomaly d. Unusual behavior
A follower ______.
a. should maintain his or her beliefs, style, and behavior, allowing an experienced and effective leader to adapt b. should remain loyal, and he or she will not get into too much trouble c. should assess a leader’s style and goals and attempt to make compromises d. none of these
Which of the following statements is not true about a 2-for-1 stock split?
a. Total contributed capital increases. b. Par value per share is reduced to half of what it was before the split. c. A stockholder with ten shares before the split owns twenty shares after the split. d. The market price probably will decrease.
Pricing can be used to
A) change available supply. B) reduce supply chain costs. C) influence demand if customers are price sensitive. D) all of the above