Discuss the impact of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc, for expert witness testimony
What will be an ideal response?
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993) established standards for the admission of expert testimony in federal courts. Under Daubert, an expert's testimony must be specialized and relate directly to some fact at issue in the case: "Expert testimony which does not relate to any issue in the case is not relevant and, ergo,
non-helpful.". The Supreme Court also noted that expert testimony must fit the case. Fitness is determined by examining how helpful the testimony is. This "helpfulness" standard requires a valid connection between the expert testimony and the inquiry.
You might also like to view...
During ______, a juvenile’s personal information (e.g., full name, date of birth) is recorded, fingerprinted, and a criminal history is run.
A. sentencing B. booking C. initial hearing D. adjunction
The recall period in the National Crime Victimization Survey is ______.
A. 6 months B. 1 year C. 24 months D. lifetime
While taking a purse from a 66-year-old victim, the actor knocks the woman down, causing her to receive a bruised elbow. He committed
a. felony theft. b. burglary. c. robbery. d. aggravated robbery. e. none of the above.
The primary criminal laws aimed at ____ property fraud are the federal copyright and patent acts and federal and state trade secret acts
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word