Why might a plaintiff want to resort to the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur?
What will be an ideal response?
In a res ipsa loquitur case the jury is allowed to infer negligence. In some courts, meeting the requirements of the doctrine creates a presumption of negligence, which the defendant must rebut to avoid a directed verdict. In a few courts, once res ipsa loquitur applies, the defendant must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that he or she did not act negligently.
You might also like to view...
?Checks from the estate checking account do all of the following EXCEPT:
A. ?Act as creditors' admissions of payment B. ?Establish a record of all payments and distributions C. ?Serve as evidence and verification of payment of taxes D. ?'Act as a credit account until estate funds are released
What is meant by "preserving the bankruptcy estate?"
What will be an ideal response?
Which of the following is not a necessary characteristic of being a successful litigation paralegal?
a. Being highly motivated b. Paying attention to detail c. Being competent with technology d. None of these choices are correct
Which of the following statements is true about the rights and benefits that flow from a valid marriage and alternative relationships?
A) According to the United States General Accounting Office, there are more than 1,000 rights and duties that flow from a valid marriage. B) When a man and woman live together as if they are husband and wife for a period of seven years, they are considered to be common law married in all states and are entitled to all spousal rights allowed under state and federal law. C) Legally married same-sex spouses are entitled to all the same rights and benefits as heterosexual couples. D) Civil unions generally afford same-sex couples fewer rights than do domestic partnerships.