The exclusionary rule operates differently in the confessions/interrogation context (compared to in the Fourth Amendment context). Explain the difference
What will be an ideal response?
Good answers should explain that in the Fourth Amendment context illegally obtained evidence and its derivative are excluded from use as evidence. But with the Fourteenth Amendment involuntary statements physical evidence obtained in violation of Miranda are admissible. Students should incorporate United States v. Bayer and Michigan v. Tucker in their answers.
You might also like to view...
The distribution of funds among agencies is typically allocated on a quarterly basis
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Which of the following is considered a goal of research?
A. advance scientific knowledge B. shape social policy C. organize social action D. all of these
Most criminal justice scholars agree that ______.
a. drugs cause crime b. crime causes drugs c. crime is synonymous with drugs d. drugs and crime are related
Which is an example of victim precipitation?
a. Having a neighbor bring in one's mail while on vacation b. Leaving keys in the car ignition while making a quick stop at a convenience store c. Putting bicycles in a garage at night rather than leaving them in the yard d. Leaving a watchdog in the house while on vacation