INSTRUCTIONS: In each problem below, you are given a statement, its truth value in parentheses, and a new statement. You must determine how the new statement is related to the given statement and determine the truth value of the new statement. Take the Aristotelian standpoint and assume that ‘A' and ‘B' denote things that actually exist. No A are B. (T) Some A are B
A) Subalternation. (T)
B) Contradiction. (F)
C) Conversion. (T)
D) Contrary. (F)
E) Contraposition. (Und.)
B
You might also like to view...
It's central to Kant's resolution of the determinism/free will debate that:
A. physics is an incomplete science. B. causation is a scientific concept, not an ethical one. D. physics tells us only about the world as it appears to us, not about how it is in independent reality. D. we are causally determined in the realm of independent reality. E. we are free from the standpoint of the realm of appearance.
What notion should be at the heart of ethical theory, according to virtue ethics
What will be an ideal response?
State laws that require physicians to be mandated reporters could be justified on the basis of
a) the duty to warn. b) the duty to rescue. c) paternalism. d) the right to confidentiality.
Is the following a physical causal explanation or behavioral causal explanation? "The lack of adequate public transport indirectly contributes to global warming."
A. behavioral B. physical