Research suggests that TASERS may pose a serious risk of inducing a heart attack
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
FALSE
You might also like to view...
Pursuant to a warrant from California, Chicago police arrested Abdul Martinez. The Chicago police officers knew virtually nothing about the case in California and were not particularly interested in conducting interrogation of Abdul Martinez
Once they discovered that they had arrested the right man, police officers did not question him and placed him in a temporary holding cell pending either a court hearing or a waiver of extradition. If the police have not interrogated Abdul Martinez about the merits of his case in California in any way A) there is absolutely no necessity to inform him of his legal rights recognized by the Miranda decision because Abdul Martinez was not in California custody. B) because the Miranda decision has constitutional dimension, police cannot decide which case to use the warnings and which case to let a defendant wonder what legal rights exist. C) he is still entitled to have the warnings under Miranda read and explained to him by the Chicago Police before he is turned over to California authorities because he was in their custody. D) there is absolutely no necessity to inform him of his legal rights recognized by the Miranda decision because one of the required reasons for offering the Miranda warnings was missing. E) he will not be able to be successfully prosecuted in California.
An elderly woman dies after being kept from receiving proper health care by her children. The manner of her death would be:
a. accident. b. suicide. c. natural death. d. homicide.
Which of the following is NOT a type of electronic surveillance?
a. Stakeout b. Eavesdropping c. Night vision d. CCTV
Discuss Arizona v. Gant (2009). What is the history of the case, what constitutional amendment is under scrutiny, and how did the Court rule? Do you agree or disagree with the Courts holding? Explain
What will be an ideal response?