Lou enters into an agreement with LaFancy Inc., an event management company, to coordinate her wedding in June for the sum of $10,000. In March, Lou calls LaFancy to tell the company the deal is off, because she thinks she can do a better job herself. LaFancy sues Lou, and Lou argues lack of consideration as a defense. Which of the following statements holds true of this scenario?
A. Lou can enforce LaFancy's promise to her.
B. Lou was the only promisor in this contract.
C. LaFancy had a legal duty to plan Lou's wedding even before the agreement was signed.
D. LaFancy has given consideration.
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
Because a business should have as its primary objective the earning of a minimum rate of return on assets, the return on assets pricing method has a great deal of appeal and support
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
In the event there is an ambiguity in a description, which of the following would be used to resolve the ambiguity?
A) The neighbors' ideas B) Boundary markers C) A plat map D) None of the above
The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)
A. was founded in 1975. B. was conceived as a collective-bargaining unit. C. was organized in response to the formation of the European Community. D. was effective in increasing the supply of oil. E. has as its objective completely free trade among its members.
When financial statements are accompanied by the report of an independent auditor, users have the assurance that the statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting and financial reporting standards established by authoritative bodies, and that all material facts have been disclosed.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)