Japanese keiretsu is considered to be a strong cooperative strategy that will have an impact in global marketing. Describe what it is and how it can affect U.S. businesses
What will be an ideal response?
Japan's keiretsu represents a special category of cooperative strategy which is an interbusiness alliance or enterprise group. It exists in a broad spectrum of markets, including the capital market, primary goods markets, and component parts markets. Keiretsu relationships are often cemented by bank ownership of large blocks of stock and by cross-ownership of stock between a company and its buyers and nonfinancial suppliers. Also, keiretsu executives can legally sit on each other's boards, share information, and coordinate prices. Thus, keiretsu serves as a cartel that has the government's blessing. Although it is not a market entry strategy per se, it played an integral part in the international success of the Japanese companies as they sought new markets. Clyde Prestowitz provided the following example to show how keiretsu relationships have a potential impact on U.S. businesses. In the 1980s, Nissan was in the market for a supercomputer to use in car design. Two vendors under consideration were Cray and Hitachi. Cray was the worldwide leader in supercomputers, and Hitachi had no functional product to offer. When it appeared that the purchase of a Cray computer was pending, Hitachi executives called for solidarity since both Nissan and Hitachi were members of the same big six keiretsu. Hitachi was pushing Nissan to show preference for Hitachi, and the United States had to put pressure on both Nissan and the Japanese government to have the sale proceed with Cray. Because keiretsu relationships are crossing the Pacific and directly affecting the American market, the U.S. companies have a reason for concern. In California alone, keiretsu owns more than half of the Japanese businesses. Other keiretsu businesses are moving into different parts of the United States.
You might also like to view...
Garth's Imports sold a car to Wally on credit for $30,000 . Garth assigned to Cassandra all of his rights to receive money from Wally. Cassandra did not inform Wally of the assignment. Therefore, Wally continued to make the next three payments directly to Garth. Shortly thereafter, Garth left the country with the money. If Cassandra sues Wally for the missing three payments:
a. Cassandra will not be able to collect the money from Wally. b. Wally is not liable for the three payments because an assignment is not valid unless the obligor is notified. c. Wally is liable for the three payments because Cassandra paid consideration for the assignment rights. d. Wally cannot raise the defense of previous payment.
________ diversity refers to diversity regarding observable attributes such as race, ethnicity, sex, and age.
A. Deep-level B. Disjunctive C. Conjunctive D. Surface-level E. Additive
Should corporations issue bonds in countries where they face the lowest credit spreads? Be very specific about the concept of credit spread you use
What will be an ideal response?
When a lead firm invests in supplier resources or offers training, this is an example of:
A. Shared value. B. Root cause analysis. C. Supplier development. D. Supply chain auditing.