In the case of Wilson v Arkansas (1995), what did the court decide?
a. The police can never enter a home to execute a warrant without knocking first.
b. Searches of automobiles did not require probable cause because of the "mobility factor."
c. Officers can only "pat" someone down, and the pat-down can only be for weapons.
d. The issue of allowing police to enter without knocking was reasonable but the state courts were remandedto determine reasonableness for the use of a "no-knock" entry.
d
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is not associated with the partitioning of an HDD?
a. Quadrant b. Sector c. Track d. Cluster
As a search incident to arrest, an officer may
A. search only the defendant’s person. B. search the defendant and all areas within the defendant’s immediate control. C. search the defendant and any person with the defendant at the time of arrest. D. search the defendant, those areas within the defendant’s immediate control, and any property owned by the defendant.
List three common signs of arson at a fire scene
What will be an ideal response?
The search of the footlocker in U.S. v. Chadwick (1977 ) had to be done under a search warrant because the footlocker is a/an ________________ under the Fourth Amendment
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word