In Illinois v. Caballes, the Supreme Court ruled that:
a. Drivers of automobiles have a reasonable expectation of privacy that protects them from the use of drugsniffing dogs without a warrant.
b. Drug-sniffing dogs can only be used if there is reasonable suspicion the driver has narcotics.
c. Drug-sniffing dog searches are prone to many errors and are so intimidating that officials must
haveprobable cause to use them.
d. The use of well-trained drug-sniffing dogs to expose contraband items that would remain hidden in a routinetraffic stop, does not intrude on a driver's reasonable expectation of privacy and the Fourth Amendmentdoes not apply.
d
You might also like to view...
_________________ created a system where African Americans were forced to live separate from Caucasians, where in theory their existence was equal but, in reality, they were given discriminatory treatment and inadequate resources
a. The Strive Act b. The J.D. "Jim Dandy" Barham Separate but Equal Act c. Jim Crow laws d. None of the above
Drug testing reduces the incidence of drug usage among officers
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.
The "fire tetrahedron" includes the three sides of the fire triangle
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The ________ rests on the assumption that criminal law has a social control function
A) ?conflict B) ?interactionist C) ?consensus D) ?constructionist E) ?Puritanical