In Star Valley RanchAssociation v. Daley, the court held that?
A. ?property owners are bound by restrictive covenants if they took the property with notice of those covenants; therefore, the covenants can only be amended by consent of 100% of the property owners.
B. ?the district court did err in holding that the amended covenants were invalid as they pertained to Plats 1, 2, and 3 of the Star Valley Ranch Subdivision because 73% of all of the lot owners of record voted to amend the covenants.
C. ?the district court did not err in holding that the amended covenants were invalid as they pertained to Plats 1, 2, and 3 of the Star Valley Ranch Subdivision because only 60% of the lot owners in Plats 1 and 2 voted to amend their covenants, and only 63% of the lot owners in Plat 3 voted to amend their covenants.
D. ?the developer can amend the restrictive covenants without consent of the property owners simply to make the covenants throughout the development identical.
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
A pretrial memorandum is:
A) The same thing as a trial brief B) The pre-trial memorandum generally includes all information about the trial, including witnesses, evidence, stipulations, jury instructions and estimated length of trial. C) The trial memorandum generally includes all information about the trial, including witnesses, evidence, stipulations, jury instructions and estimated length of trial. D) The trial memorandum generally includes caselaw and argument to persuade the judge to rule on an unresolved legal issue, such as the admissibility of evidence.
When must the debtor supplement the schedules?
What will be an ideal response?
Contrast the scope of property of the estate in a Chapter 7 case versus a Chapter 12 case.
What will be an ideal response?
Specialists are typically held to a national standard of care in their field of expertise.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)