Answer the following statement(s) true (T) or false (F)
1.Following the Court’s ruling in United States v. Calandra (1974), the exclusionary rule is viewed as a doctrine that is not an ironclad requirement of the Fourth Amendment that judges are compelled to apply in every circumstance.
2.One of the key arguments in support of the exclusionary rule is that the exclusionary rule deters the police, thus serving to prevent future violations, not repair past violations.
3.The silver platter doctrine allowed federal prosecutors to use evidence seized illegally by federal agents at trial.
4.One of the arguments against the exclusionary rule is that it undermines the purpose of the criminal trial.
5.The exclusionary rule is a constitutional right required by the Fourth Amendment as a way to address evidence that is seized in violation of protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
1.true
2.rue
3.false
4.true
5.false
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is NOT true of chromosomes?
a. They were first visualized in 1842. b. Human beings have 46 pairs of chromosomes. c. Human beings have 23 pairs of chromosomes. d. The mother always contributes an X chromosome to the child.
What type of law do most lawyers practice?
a. environmental law b. civil law c. criminal law d. non-profit law
Melanin, the primary content of the pigment granules, gives the hair its ___________
a. DNA b. brown color c. typing d. gender
A police officer would likely need a warrant for searches not conducted in plain view
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false