Compare and contrast the approaches of the Department of State and the National Security Council to global foreign policy issues.
What will be an ideal response?
A recent addition to the foreign policy apparatus, the national security adviser has traditionally competed with the secretary of state for influence over foreign policy-and for influence over the president as well. The tension between the two advisers also stems from the differing approaches each agency takes in shaping foreign policy. Frequently, the State Department has a long-term view of world affairs and advocates foreign policies in keeping with long-term goals. In contrast, the National Security Council focuses more on short-term crises and objectives.
You might also like to view...
The discovery of oil in Texas contributed to which of the following?
What will be an ideal response?
Which scale of measurement provides the best match with the real number system?
A) ordinal B) nominal C) ratio D) interval
As far as individual subcultures are concerned, consociational theory provides them with
a. no supremacy. b. little influence over local affairs. c. autonomy in regulating their own affairs. d. all of the above. e. none of the above.
Congress can shape foreign assistance policies by __________ certain funds for specific countries or purposes (e.g. specifying a certain amount of aid to Pakistan)
a. excising c. investing b. earmarking d. All of the above are true.