Discuss how OR can affect decisions regarding using cognitive ability tests and banding solutions (and/or other selection issues pertaining to diversity).

What will be an ideal response?


Varies. For example, consider the areas of test-score banding discussed in Chapter 8. The traditional approach to staffing decision-making is to use a strict top–down procedure in which selection is made based on who obtained the highest test score(s). However, those involved in staffing decisions face a paradoxical situation because using general cognitive abilities and other valid predictors of job performance leads to adverse impact (Aguinis & Smith, 2007). Consequently, users of selection instruments face what seems to be a catch-22: choosing to use general cognitive abilities tests and risk decreasing the diversity of an organization’s workforce, or choosing to use predictors that will not diminish diversity, but are not as valid as cognitive abilities tests. Based on this description, the situation seems the classical “win–lose” scenario of pitting social versus economic performance in a mutually exclusive manner. As discussed in Chapter 8, test-score banding was proposed as a method to solve this apparent dilemma because it is an alternative to the strict top–down selection strategy that often leads to adverse impact. Banding is based on the premise that an observed difference in the scores of two job applicants may be the result of measurement error instead of actual differences in the construct that is measured. Consequently, if it cannot be determined with a reasonable amount of certainty that two applicants differ on the construct underlying a predictor or criterion score, then there may be little reason to believe that they differ with respect to job performance. In other words, banding groups applicants who have “indistinguishable” scores. Consequently, job applicants who fall within the same band are considered equally qualified for the job in question. Therefore, choices can then be made among these “equivalent” applicants based on criteria other than test scores, such as diversity considerations. The case of test-score banding, although not labeled as such in the HRM literature, is an example of SRM in which the organization considers both economic and social interests.

Legal Studies & Paralegal

You might also like to view...

An attorney’s legal opinion on the title of a property covers only those items that are contained in the public records.

Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)

Legal Studies & Paralegal

E-filing has resulted in increased costs of printing, postage, and file storage for many law firms.

Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)

Legal Studies & Paralegal

?Vicarious liability is liability

A. ?without regard to the personal fault of the employer for torts committed by an employee in the course of employment. B. ?with regard to the personal fault of the employer for torts committed by an employee in the course of employment. C. ?of an employee for his or her own actions. D. ?of an attorney for his or her client.

Legal Studies & Paralegal

In some states, insanity is treated as

A. a missing element B. a justification C. a syndrome D. a mistake of fact

Legal Studies & Paralegal