How were the Cold War conflicts fundamentally different from more recent conflicts involving terrorism? What were the principal Cold War conflicts, and who were the principal combatants? How have recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan differed from

the Cold War conflicts? What changes in the approach to national security have been required because of terrorism?

What will be an ideal response?


An ideal response will:
1, Identify the main Cold War combatants as the United States and the Soviet Union.
2, Describe the fundamental differences between the Cold War and conflicts involving terrorism, including the types of combatants, the types of warfare, the goals, and the weapons used.
3, List the main characteristics of the Cold War, which included a period of increased tensions (but not live combat) between the United States and the Soviet Union, the desire to contain Soviet influence (and the accompanying spread of communism), and heavy buildup of nuclear weapons.
4, Detail the principal Cold War confrontations that involved strengthening those trying to ward off communist influence, such as in Greece, South Korea, and Berlin.
5, Describe the Vietnam War as a direct military conflict driven by the Cold War mentality about the need to stop the spread of communism in Asia.
6, Identify détente as the beginning point of transformation from conflict thinking to cooperative thinking in foreign policy strategy.
7, Reveal how the Cold War conflict was finally resolved with the collapse of the Soviet Union, although the tensions had somewhat subsided during the détente.
8, Discuss recent terrorist attacks and show how they reveal the main characteristics of terrorism, which include attacks by nongovernmental actors on civilian targets in order to demoralize populations and governments, the use of stealth and surprise, and the decentralized nature of the terrorist threat.
9, Review how the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan in response to the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks were seen as efforts to prevent future terrorist attacks before they had fully developed.
10, Discuss how the wars had mixed results, with reconstruction in Iraq straining America's defense resources and the war in Afghanistan prompting Al Qaeda to transform itself into an umbrella organization that provides a focal point for loosely affiliated terrorist groups in various countries.
11, Conclude that the fight against terrorism will continue, that military force alone is not likely to suffice, and that political changes that erode and undermine support for the ideology and strategy of terrorists will be required.

Political Science

You might also like to view...

The introduction to Chapter 2 uses the example of scientific

forestry to make the point that: a. state efforts to plan and administer forests and society are almost always destructive. b. state efforts to plan and administer forests and society are usually productive. c. state efforts to plan and administer forests and society lead to more bureaucracy and higher inefficiency. d. state efforts to plan and administer forests and society can both develop people's capabilities or impede them, just as they can manage forests in ways that destroy their ecology or contribute to them.

Political Science

Which of the following candidates for public office is most likely to receive support from the middle-class voter in the United States?

a. a collectivist b. an agnostic c. an elitist d. a populist

Political Science

Which of the theoretical approaches for understanding foreign policy argue that repeated interactions between states lessen the effects of anarchy on state behavior?

a. Structural realism b. Social constructivism c. Neorealism d. Neoliberal institutionalism

Political Science

Which of the following is NOT a guideline that determines what a president should do in times of crisis?

A) draw on a range of advisers and opinions B) not act in unnecessary haste C) have a well-designed, formal review process, with thorough analysis and open debate D) rigorously examine the underlying reasons underlying all options E) expeditiously remove all members from your your Cabinet who fail to engage in Groupthink

Political Science