How did Miranda v. Arizona change the way law enforcement treated criminal defendants? How has the Supreme Court tinkered with these rights over time?
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1, Discuss the holding of Miranda v. Arizona.
2, Explain what is meant by Miranda rights and how police officers use them.
3, Analyze how hearing the Miranda rights helps a criminal defendant to be more informed about his or her rights as an accused party.
4, Describe how the Miranda decision has been applied by the Supreme Court at different times.
You might also like to view...
A judge informs the accused of the charges during a(n) a. preliminary hearing. b. indictment
c. arraignment. d. pretrial hearing.
The degree of freedom used for a Chi-Square Table is determined by the product of the number of columns minus _____ , and the number of rows minus _____.
a. 1;2 b. 0;1 c. 2;2 d. 1;1
Which three groups harbor the most resentment regarding the lack of civil rights from the Islamic Republic?
a. Military officers, the bazaari, and religious minorities b. Modern middle class, the Azeri population, and the lower classes c. Modern middle class, students, and military officers d. Organized labor, the lower classes, and students e. Jews, educated women, and students
Which of the following served as President George W. Bush's Secretary of Defense?
A) Janet Reno B) John Ashcroft C) Colin Powell D) Donald Rumsfeld E) Condoleezza Rice