Explain judicial restraint and judicial activism and what role they play within the court system by giving Supreme Court case Kyllo v. United States
What will be an ideal response?
Judicial restraint is the philosophy of limiting decisions to the facts of each case, deciding only the issue or issues that need to be resolved in a particular situation. Use of precedent.
Judicial activism is the philosophy of using one's power as a judge to do more that interpret the Constitution or laws by avoiding precedent and handing down decisions with sweeping implications for the future. Avoids precedent.
In Kyllo v. United States, it was decided the it was unconstitutional to use thermal-imaging without a warrant. This simple-looking decision has great and long-lasting impacts on the police.
You might also like to view...
Many states have only a single appellate court, which is generally referred to as the ________ Court
Fill in the blank with correct word.
About 75 percent of female inmates have used drugs at some time in their lives.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
These killers are typically out of touch with reality and may be diagnosed as psychotic or schizophrenic.
A. idealistic B. mission-oriented C. power/control D. visionary
Sport utility vehicles need different equipment because they are more likely to ________ in an accident.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).