Which argument defending the justice of reverse discrimination do you find strongest?
What will be an ideal response?
Which argument attacking it? Which of the two do you find most persuasive? Why?
You might also like to view...
Who launched the Creative Commons License?
a. Larry Jones c. Leslie Smart b. Lawrence Lessig d. Doris Lessing
An argument begs the question against if and only if it has
A) a controversial conclusion. B) a unsupported controversial premise. C) a supported controversial premise.
According to Kant the physical world was
a. chaotic b. causally determined by physical laws c. ruled by chance d. not to be separated from the moral or spiritual realm
Arguments that derive their persuasiveness from a threat to an individual's well-being commit the fallacy of
A. appeal to the people B. appeal to pity C. appeal to force D. abusive ad hominem