What is the difference between a confession and an incriminating statement? How do these relate to the Miranda ruling?
What will be an ideal response?
Confessions acknowledge guilt and include information regarding each essential element of the criminal offense. Confessions are considered direct evidence.Incriminating statements do not necessarily acknowledge guilt, but they tend to implicate the defendant's culpability in one or more areas. Unlike confessions, incriminating statements are considered circumstantial evidence.
Miranda only attaches in cases in which a suspect is in custody and being interrogated. Prosecutors seeking to introduce incriminating statements must demonstrate that such statements were voluntarily given after said suspect was informed of his or her rights, that the rights were understood, and that the accused voluntarily waived these rights.
You might also like to view...
Consent decrees can provide an essential blueprint for ________
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
A key concept in the criminal justice process, involving the mutual transfer of resources among individual actors, is known as:
a. exchange. b. referrals. c. system. d. discretion. e. disparity.
The norms and values of prison inmates are known as the ____________________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Military-industrial complex is a term coined by _____ to describe the relationship between American military forces and private industry
a. Lyndon Johnson b. George W. Bush c. Ronald Regan d. Dwight Eisenhower