In the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case referenced in the text, regarding the constitutionality of corporate political expenditures, the U.S. Supreme Court:
a. upheld federal laws banning corporate independent expenditures on political candidates and also upheld the federal prohibition on the use of corporate treasury funds for electioneering communications or express advocacy.
b. upheld federal laws banning corporate independent expenditures on political candidates but struck as unconstitutional the federal prohibition on the use of corporate treasury funds for electioneering communications or express advocacy.
c. struck down as unconstitutional federal law banning corporate independent expenditures on political candidates but upheld the federal prohibition on the use of corporate treasury funds for electioneering communications or express advocacy.
d. struck down as unconstitutional federal law banning corporate independent expenditures on political candidates and also struck down as unconstitutional the federal prohibition on the use of corporate treasury funds for electioneering communications or express advocacy.
d
You might also like to view...
According to the United Nations code of conduct for transnational corporations, companies are free to give gifts or payments to ensure the business transaction occurs
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
In a weighted moving average, the weights assigned must sum to 1
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Leverage ratios measure the firm's ability to use its own money to fund operations
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
The spot exchange rate in dollars per euro is $1.31. Dollar denominated interest rates are 4.0% and euro denominated interest rates are 3.0%. What is the difference in call and put option prices given a 2-year option and a $1.34 strike price?
A) -$0.1041 B) -$0.0652 C) $0.1233 D) $0.1546