Why do the courts use presumptions?
What will be an ideal response?
Often, it is difficult to prove the requisite intent required to convict the defendant of a certain crime. For example, in one state, first-degree murder may be defined as the unlawful and intentional killing of a human being with malice. How do you establish that the defendant actually intended to kill the victim, especially when the defendant claims that the killing was accidental? To overcome this difficulty, legislatures and courts establish rules of presumption.
You might also like to view...
A sentencing alternative that requires offenders to spend at least part of their time working for a community agency is known as ________
a. community service b. home confinement c. intensive probation supervision d. mixed sentence
Once the lead investigator determines that all pertinent evidence at the crime scene has been located, the investigators must perform what?
a. The walk-through b. The initial survey c. The final survey d. The crime-scene search
Which of the following is the police supervisor's most effective method of reaching and communicating with the public?
A. Requesting officers on the beat meet and greet as many people as they can daily B. Traditional news media and social media platforms C. Using the grapevine and rumors to spread information D. By holding community policing meetings
Totality-of-conditions cases involve claims that some combination of prison practices and conditions makes a prison, as a whole, unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)