The directors of a corporation do not have the power to delegate authority to any of its members to act for the corporation
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
False
You might also like to view...
Which of the following statements about group and organizational norms is false?
A. The pressures of escalating commitment may predispose parties to commit more unethical actions. B. Organizations may exert direct pressures on an individual to breach ethics or even break the law in the service of achieving some corporate or organizational goal. C. Job related pressures within particular work groups, departments, or divisions may be such that marginally ethical behavior is not only tolerated, but even condoned. D. The more loyalty and commitment people feel toward an organization, the less likely they may be to suspend their own ethical judgment and engage in unethical behavior.
Scenario 13.1 Use the following to answer the questions. Kelly Rose, Inc. markets several different brands, under its own Kelly Rose name label, as well as others. Its primary brands, such as Kelly Rose, Kelly & Ko, and KRC, are sold to wholesalers. These brands are then available through retail department stores such as Kohl's and Macy's. The wholesale-based brands division is positioned as customer-focused and cost-efficient. Its premium brands division includes labels such as Saffie Campbell, Martyn Curry, and Costura Moderno. These premium brands are sold through stores that the Kelly Rose company owns. Refer to Scenario 13.1. Kelly Rose, Inc. uses which type of channel of distribution for its premium brands?
A. A short, direct channel B. A long, direct channel C. Multichannel distribution D. Horizontal integration E. Intensive distribution
What are permissive bargaining subjects?
In Cove Management v. AFLAC, Galgano, an independent contractor who solicited insurance business for AFLAC, rented office space from Cove under AFLAC's name. When Galgano defaulted on payments, Cove sued AFLAC contending that Galgano was its agent when he rented the office, so AFLAC was liable. The appeals court held that AFLAC:
a. was not obligated to the lease because real estate deals must be in writing with the principal of the company agreeing to the lease b. was not obligated to the lease because Galgano did not have apparent authority to sign a lease that would bind AFLAC c. was obligated on the lease as its employee had apparent authority d. was not obligated on the lease, but its employee who told Galgano it was ok to enter into such a lease was obligated e. all of the other choices are correct