On Monday, Travis took his four-wheeler to Reppart's Equipment & Service for repair because the steering was not working properly. On Friday he called Reppart's to see if his four-wheeler was ready because he wanted it for a weekend trip. Reppart's said
they had done the major repairs but that the steering system still needed some work and they needed another few days to finish the repairs. Travis told them he would pick the four-wheeler up and use it for the weekend and then bring it back to have them finish their work. While riding with friends on the weekend, Travis ran into someone because the steering stuck and he couldn't swerve to avoid them. Discuss how a court would determine causation in a negligence suit against Travis.
Courts look at two issues to determine causation: Was the defendant's behavior the factual cause of the harm? Was this type of harm foreseeable?
If Travis's breach of duty physically led to the ultimate harm, it is the factual cause. Since Travis knew the repairs were not completed, his unreasonable behavior in using the four-wheeler was the factual cause of the harm to the plaintiff.
For Travis to be liable, the type of harm must have been reasonably foreseeable. Travis could easily foresee that a bad steering system could cause an accident while he was riding. He need not have foreseen the exact results, but he could foresee the general type of harm involving defective steering. Therefore, in this case the factual cause and foreseeable harm elements of a negligence suit against Travis would have been met.
You might also like to view...
Sellers might accept a(n) ________, one whose removal from the country is restricted by the buyer's government, if they can buy other goods in that country that they need themselves or can sell elsewhere for a needed currency
A) blocked currency B) countervailing duty C) custom duty D) anti-dumping duty E) tariff
How do public relations solutions help organizations "cut through the clutter," getting their message across to consumers who have thousands of advertising messages directed at them?
What will be an ideal response?
Helping employees who have been hurt by a human resource decision is part of which ethical standard?
A. advance the organization’s objective B. enhance the dignity of those harmed by the action C. strive to do no damage D. sustain the moral sensibility of those executing morally ambiguous tasks
The encourager role mediates the differences between team members
Indicate whether the statement is true or false