State constitutions have generally not played a substantially important role in defining civil liberties until recently. Why not? What has been the major reason for the change? By what term is the state resurgence in constitutional law known?
What will be an ideal response?
State constitutions have not played an important role in defining civil liberties until recently. This is due to the fact that state and federal courts have looked almost exclusively to the national Constitution to answer questions related to civil liberties, particularly in criminal cases. Additionally, state courts often have a tendency to interpret state constitutional rights as identical to those secured by the national Constitution. Increasingly, this is not the case. During the past two decades, commentators, judges, and attorneys have shown a renewed interest in state constitutional law. This resurgence is known by the term New Federalism.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following is NOT a reason articulated by the Supreme Court as a reason allowing automobile searches without a warrant?
a. Automobiles are not subject to the probable cause requirement. b. Automobiles travel on public roads. c. Automobiles are subject to state regulations and licensing requirements. d. Automobiles may be impounded for safety reasons.
The establishment of an accreditation of forensic methodologies and examiners is expected to ________
a. include both true experts and self-proclaimed experts b. include only investigators, not forensic programmers c. increase the likelihood of successful evidentiary challenges d. increase awareness and extend professionalism
In 1967, the Israelis seized the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and the Golan Heights in the ________
War. A) Six Day B) 100 hours C) Syrian D) Yom Kippur
______________is a process through which messages are exchanged
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word