List and describe the differences between testing the government's case by grand jury review and by preliminary hearing
What will be an ideal response?
The goal of both grand jury review and a preliminary hearing is to decide whether
there is enough evidence to bring defendants to trial. The preliminary hearing process
stresses adversarial, open, accusatory values and control by experts. Grand jury
review underscores the value of lay participation in criminal proceedings.
Preliminary hearings are public; grand jury proceedings are secret. Preliminary
hearings are adversarial proceedings in which the defense can challenge the
prosecution's case? grand juries hear only the prosecution's case. Judges preside over
preliminary hearings; prosecutors manage the grand jury . In preliminary hearings,
judges determine whether there is enough evidence to proceed to trial; grand jury
review relies on grand jurors, citizens selected to serve a term, to decide whether there
is enough evidence to go to trial. Finally, defendants and their lawyers attend
preliminary hearings; in grand jury review, defendants and their lawyers are not
present.
You might also like to view...
Prison personnel face ethical issues because of a conflict between their ______ and custody roles.
What will be an ideal response?
The ____Clause of the U.S. Constitution gives the federal government the authority to regulate white-collar crime
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
Irish terrorists blowing up other Irishmen in Belfast would not be considered
a. terrorism, since it had criminal motives. b. domestic terrorism. c. international terrorism. d. sub-state terrorism.
The empirical literature has consistently supported the superiority of ______ dataover ______ data.
A. clinical; antecedent B. clinical; actuarial C. actuarial; antecedent D. actuarial; clinical