?PASO 2.Las aspiraciones de Antonio.Andrea is talking to her younger brother, Antonio, about his goals for the future. Match Andrea's questions with Antonio's answers. Then, complete each of Andrea's reactions by conjugating the verbs in parentheses in the present subjunctive.
?Andrea
A. ?No lo sé…. Mis amigos y yo no estamos seguros de qué queremos hacer.
B. Sí, quiero ser muy muy rico. Y también quiero viajar por todo el mundo.
C. Pues, nunca. Estoy pensando en abandonar la universidad. Me siento
D. No, no lo he visto. Siempre está ocupado.
E. Mejor no. Creo que voy a ganar más dinero cantando en el metro.
A. ?¿Qué planes tienes para el futuro?
B. ?¡Deberían estarlo! ¿Tú no tienes metas en la vida?
C. ?Bien, si quieres tener dinero, debes trabajar mucho. ¿Cuándo piensas graduarte?
D. ?¿Y por qué no solicitas una beca? ¿Has hablado con tu consejero?
E. ?Pídele una cita. Oye, he oído que hay pasantías disponibles en la empresa donde trabaja mi novio. ¿Quieres que pida información?
You might also like to view...
Complete lo siguiente, usando el pretérito o el imperfecto de los verbos dados.
______________ (Ser) las ocho cuando yo ______________ (llegar) a la oficina ayer. Mi jefe me ______________ (decir) que él ______________ (necesitar) los informes. Yo no ______________ (poder) dárselos hasta las dos de la tarde.
Adam
Listen to the following conversation between the professor and Adam. Adam:??????????????????????? Professor: ???????????? Adam: ????????????????????? Professor: ????????????????(??????)??????????? Adam: ????????????????????????????????????????????(??????)???????????? Professor: ??????????????(??????)??????????????????(??????)????????????????????????? Adam: ???????????? Professor: ???(??????)????????????????????? Adam: ?????????????????????? Professor: ???????????????????????????????(??????)?150???????????????????????????????????????????? Adam: ?????????????????????? Professor: ?????(?)????????????????????????????? Adam: ????????????????????????????? a. forgot to bring a textbook. b. has a textbook with him but he didn't open it in class. c. read the textbook but there are too many kanji he doesn't know. d. didn't buy a textbook.
The best-known decision affecting prejudicial press coverage of criminal cases is Sheppard v. Maxwell. In 1954, Dr. Samuel Sheppard of Cleveland was sentenced to life imprisonment for murdering his wife. His conviction followed reams of newspaper stories, many of which proclaimed his guilt before the jury had decided the case. The jurors, who went home each evening, were told by the judge not to
read newspapers or pay attention to broadcast reports, but no one monitored what the jurors did. Twelve years later, lawyer F. Lee Bailey took Sheppard's trial to the U.S. Supreme Court, where a conviction was overturned on the premise that Sheppard had been a victim of a biased jury. In writing the decision, Justice Tom C. Clark prescribed several remedies. He said that reporters should have been limited to certain areas in the courtroom, that the news media should not have been allowed to interview the witnesses, and that the court should have forbidden statements outside of the courtroom. The outcome of the Sheppard case led to many courtroom experiments with restrictions on the press. The most widespread practices were restraining (gag) orders and closed proceedings. With a gag order, the judge limited what the press could report. But since 1980, several court cases have overturned most of these limitations so that today the press is rarely excluded from courtroom proceedings, and the exclusion lasts only as long as it takes the news organization to appeal to a higher court for access. Cameras in the courtroom is a sticky issue between judges, who want to avoid the disruption that cameras present, and broadcast newspeople, who want to photograph what is going on. In selected cases, however, cameras have been allowed to record complete trials. In 1994, for example, Court TV broadcast the entire trial of O.J. Simpson. Cameras in the courtroom is a state-by-state decision. Some states allow cameras during civil but not criminal trials. Other states try to completely limit access. The U.S. courts and the press are not yet completely comfortable partners. From this passage, you may infer that a. Sheppard was innocent of the murder charge. b. today the press is often blocked from court proceedings. c. newspaper reporters were biased against Sheppard. d. Justice Tom Clark was biased when he made his ruling.
Combine each group of sentences into a single sentence. Use coordination, subordination, or one of the other ways of combining ideas. In many jurisdictions, injuring or killing a police K9 is a felony. Even harassing one by throwing objects or "barking" at him is a crime.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).