In U.S. v. United States Gypsum, regarding sharing of price information by gypsum makers, the Supreme Court held that:

a. the gypsum industry is so small that it simply could not conspire to restrain information b. the case was subject to a per se rule against price fixing, so it was illegal
c. the gypsum industry, being part of construction, is exempt from antitrust laws d. the gypsum industry is so small information sharing is essential
e. none of the other choices


e

Business

You might also like to view...

Wholesalers most likely discourage less-profitable customers by ________

A) increasing product promotions B) carrying exclusive product lines C) overseeing inventory control systems D) adding service charges to small purchase orders E) requiring smaller orders to lower transportation costs

Business

Corporate powers granted by the RMBCA include all but which of the following?

a. To establish profit-sharing plans and other employee benefit plans. b. To make charitable donations. c. To be considered a person under the Fourth Amendment's search and seizures clause and the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause. d. To borrow and lend money.

Business

In Bayesian analysis, additional information is used to alter the conditional probability of the occurrence of an event

Indicate whether this statement is true or false.

Business

The National Science Foundation was responsible for many of the

policy decisions that led to the modern Internet. Indicate whether the statement is true or false

Business