The narrator caught up with the girl on the sidewalk just outside Hotel Poole.
a. true
b. false
b. false
You might also like to view...
The best-known decision affecting prejudicial press coverage of criminal cases is Sheppard v. Maxwell. In 1954, Dr. Samuel Sheppard of Cleveland was sentenced to life imprisonment for murdering his wife. His conviction followed reams of newspaper stories, many of which proclaimed his guilt before the jury had decided the case. The jurors, who went home each evening, were told by the judge not to
read newspapers or pay attention to broadcast reports, but no one monitored what the jurors did. Twelve years later, lawyer F. Lee Bailey took Sheppard's trial to the U.S. Supreme Court, where a conviction was overturned on the premise that Sheppard had been a victim of a biased jury. In writing the decision, Justice Tom C. Clark prescribed several remedies. He said that reporters should have been limited to certain areas in the courtroom, that the news media should not have been allowed to interview the witnesses, and that the court should have forbidden statements outside of the courtroom. The outcome of the Sheppard case led to many courtroom experiments with restrictions on the press. The most widespread practices were restraining (gag) orders and closed proceedings. With a gag order, the judge limited what the press could report. But since 1980, several court cases have overturned most of these limitations so that today the press is rarely excluded from courtroom proceedings, and the exclusion lasts only as long as it takes the news organization to appeal to a higher court for access. Cameras in the courtroom is a sticky issue between judges, who want to avoid the disruption that cameras present, and broadcast newspeople, who want to photograph what is going on. In selected cases, however, cameras have been allowed to record complete trials. In 1994, for example, Court TV broadcast the entire trial of O.J. Simpson. Cameras in the courtroom is a state-by-state decision. Some states allow cameras during civil but not criminal trials. Other states try to completely limit access. The U.S. courts and the press are not yet completely comfortable partners. From this passage, you may infer that a. Sheppard was innocent of the murder charge. b. today the press is often blocked from court proceedings. c. newspaper reporters were biased against Sheppard. d. Justice Tom Clark was biased when he made his ruling.
El trabajo de Fernanda.Fernanda got the job! She is very excited about it and is writing Agustín some text messages to give him the good news! Complete the sentences with the future tense of the verbs in parentheses.? Mis compañeros y yo (poder) _______________________ conocer muchos países.?
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Familia de palabras. Rellena el siguiente cuadro con las palabras que faltan. Modelo: el descubrimiento descubrir descubierto Nombres Verbos Adjetivos/Participios pasados el poder (1b) (1c) el conocimiento (2b) (2c) (3a) desarrollar (3c) el comestible (4b) (4c) (5a) construir (5c) la creación (6b) (6c) el gobierno (7b) (7c) el dibujo (8b) dibujado (6b)
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Select the correct pronoun for each sentence
The boss praised ____ for my work on the Peterson case. a) I b) me c) myself