Jordan and Valentina were selling imitation designer handbags on the streets of Chicago. Ina buys a bag thinking it is the real thing and makes sure to proudly display it in front of all. Later that day she sets it on the seat next to her in her subway car. The bag is stolen by Nina who runs out of the train car and onto the bustling platform. Ina follows Nina and attempts to take back the bag. Joe comes to Ina’s defense and wrestles the bag from Nina. When the altercation is all said and done Nina goes home with the bag. Joe helped her wrestle it from Ina. And Ina goes home bagless. May Joe be considered an accessory after the fact?
a. Yes.
b. No, he had no knowledge that Ina committed a crime.
c. Yes, he committed an affirmative act.
d. No, he did not frustrate the conviction of Ina.
b. No, he had no knowledge that Ina committed a crime.
You might also like to view...
How did the American court system develop? What are some of the unique features of Amer-ican court history? What is the dual-court system? Why do we have a dual-court system in Amer-ica?
What will be an ideal response?
Internal affairs processes are
A. completely in-house B. a hybrid of in-house and civilian C. entirely civilian D. neither in-house nor civilian
Describe the difference between a research question and a research hypothesis.
What will be an ideal response?
Identify the fingerprint pattern below:
A) Loop B) Whorl C) Arch D) Spiral