Explain what dual citizenship means. Explain how Barron v. Baltimore (1993) addressed this issue. Do you think the ruling was fair? Explain why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
An ideal response will:
1, Define dual citizenship. As a U.S. citizen one has the same rights as other citizens. As a citizen of a state, one may have different rights than someone in another state.
2, Describe Barron v. Baltimore (1993). The Supreme Court agreed that Barron was injured by Baltimore, but he wasn't entitled to compensation since Baltimore was protected by Maryland state law.
3, Provide an opinion on whether or not the Barron v. Baltimore (1993) ruling was fair and include a justification.
You might also like to view...
Who feared that competing opinions could lead to hostile factions that would divide rather than unify or improve society?
a. Plato b. Aristotle c. Socrates d. James Madison e. Max Weber
An agency directly involved in administering monetary policy is the
a. Federal Reserve Board. b. General Accounting Office. c. Office of Management and Budget. d. none of the above.
A concurrent resolution passed by Congress seeks to
A) censor executive branch officials. B) make significant policy decisions. C) settle housekeeping and procedural matters that affect both houses. D) propose constitutional amendments. E) reorganize committees in one house.
What does it mean when the President asks a foreign nation to remove its ambassador from the United States?
a. The United States wants the ambassador to be replaced. b. The United States has declared war on the other nation. c. The United States does not like the conduct of the other nation. d. The United States approves of the conduct of the other nation.