What are the characteristics of courthouse shootings, and what are the differences between courthouse violence that is targeted and nontargeted?
What will be an ideal response
Characteristics of courthouse shootings:
• Litigants (plaintiffs, defendants, witnesses, or lawyers) were the intended targets in about 60 percent of the shooting incidents, while judges and police officers were targeted in about 40 percent.
• About 40 percent of the shooters were shot either by the court's security forces or by their own hand.
• The majority of the 114 courthouse shooting incidents that were identified occurred in about the past 25 years.
• The firearms used were either brought in by the shooter, taken from a deputy, or smuggled in to a defendant or prisoner.
• Domestic violence or problems was the motive in one-third of the shootings, escape was the motive in one-fourth, and assassination or another reason was the motive in 35 percent.
• Victims of the shootings were judges, police officers, litigants or other court officials (including plaintiffs, defendants, witnesses, lawyers).
• In about four of ten courthouse shooting cases, the shooter was shot either by security forces or via self-inflicted gunshot wounds; the vast majority of the shooters were captured.
• While 91 percent of the respondents indicated that they have access to metal detectors, their usage varies widely; usage was often spotty or only for major trials.
There are two types of violence that can occur in courthouses:
• • Nontargeted courthouse violence involves an individual who has no specific preexisting intention of engaging in violence but who, either during, at the conclusion of, or sometime shortly after the court proceeding, becomes incensed and defiant at some procedure or outcome and acts out in the courtroom or public corridors. If this person also has a weapon, it might be used against the source of the grievance—a judge, attorney, witness, court employee, defendant or plaintiff, or bystander. If there are no judicial security screening devices or patrols on the premises, the person may proceed to attack people within the courthouse.
• • Targeted courthouse violence involves an individual who expressly intends to engage in courthouse violence. These persons often simmer and stew for long periods of time, so there is often some delay in responding to real or perceived affronts and insults. During this time, these people may or may not make threats and often create plans to circumvent security measures. They deliberately focus on specific individuals or the judiciary itself.
Of the two groups, the nontargeting group has been responsible for most of the violent incidents in our nation's courthouses.
You might also like to view...
The court created a reasonableness standard for the use of force in the case of ____________________.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
The ________________ Poor Laws of 1601 created a system of church wardens and overseers who identified delinquent children
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
When comparing crime rates among countries, all of the following EXCEPT _____ should be considered before drawing conclusions?
a. The differences in the legal definitions of crime. b. How the recording and reporting practices may vary. c. Such social features as the availability of medical facilities. d. How the auto theft rate, as a unique indicator, has varied during the last five years.
England is an example of which type of Legal Tradition:
a. Common Law b. Civil Law c. Sacred Law d. Socialist Law