When presented with information that is inconsistent with their attitudes or beliefs, people generally ask themselves which question?
A) Is there any evidence here that would make me reconsider my opinion?
B) Is this evidence stronger than the evidence consistent with my beliefs?
C) What would be the social repercussions if I change my mind on this issue?
D) Is this information flawed or limited in some way?
D) Is this information flawed or limited in some way?
You might also like to view...
A brain scan is most accurately categorized as a
a. naturalistic observation. b. physiological measure. c. structured observation. d. quasi-experiment.
The hypothesis that we are attempting to reject is the
a. Null hypothesis b. Alternative hypothesis c. Research hypothesis d. Theory-level hypothesis
Sarin gas is a type of organophosphate. It was released in a Tokyo subway in 1995 by a religious sect, killing 12 people. Organophosphates are dangerous because they a. prevent the reuptake of acetylcholine (ACh), reducing the amount available for subsequent signaling. b. stimulate an larger than normal release of acetylcholine (ACh), leading to convulsions and death
c. interfere with acetylcholinesterase (AChE), allowing acetylcholine (ACh) to overstimulate muscle fibers. d. occupy receptor sites for acetylcholine (ACh), preventing further signaling and paralyzing muscles.
Tom has the ability to pay attention in class, and screen out all the things that are going on around him. What is this called?
a. outer awareness c. sensory awareness b. selective attention d. selective observation