Describe the differences in how concurrent and consecutive sentences work. Give an example of each
What will be an ideal response?
Concurrent sentences are sentences that are served at the same time. For example,
if a defendant is convicted of burglary and sentenced to five years and is also
convicted of stealing and sentenced to two years, the judge may order the sentences
to run concurrently. When the defendant finishes serving the five years, he has
completed his sentence, because his sentence for two years was completed after the
first two years of the five year sentence. Consecutive sentences are served one
after the other. If the judge in the same case ordered the sentences to run
consecutively, after the defendant completed serving his five year sentence, he
would begin serving his two year sentence.
You might also like to view...
The belief that human beings have ______ is essential to classical criminology.
a. irrational thoughts b. biological traits c. free will d. social connections
In a hypothetical situation, a group of individuals held a peaceful protest, but the police force, which the group trusts, explained that they could not protest in that location because it was private property, even though protests had been held there from time to time before, so the people dispersed peacefully. However, this did not create a strain because the majority of those that attended believed it to be just. Which of the following best explains why they felt that way?
a. This strain was in the service of some greater good. b. The strain inflicted was not very different from their past treatment in similar circumstances. c. The process used to decide whether to inflict the strain was just. d. The police did not use excessive force.
The ruling in this landmark Supreme Court case was that defendants are entitled to an attorney if they are accused on a crime. If they cannot afford an attorney, they will be appointed one by the government.
a. Mapp v. Ohio (1961) b. Katz v. United States (1967) c. Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) d. Batson v. Kentucky (1986)
Why is shoplifting considered to be a gendered crime?
What will be an ideal response?