What does John include at the end of his book?
a. A blessing upon the Seven Churches of Asia
b. A preview of coming attractions
c. A warning about the mark of the beast
d. A curse upon anyone who changes the wording of his book
d
You might also like to view...
The fallacy committed by an argument that takes two events that happen at the same time (but are not causally related) to be causally related is known as
A) Non causa pro causa. B) Post hoc ergo propter hoc. C) Oversimplified cause.
How might Descartes' appeal to "clear and distinct" ideas be
subject to criticism? Could Descartes respond to this criticism by distinguishing between a first-person approach to his arguments (i.e., where they are aimed only at the person following them) and a third-person approach to them (i.e., where they are intended to be fully accessible to others)? What might this response look like? Would it be satisfactory? What will be an ideal response
The theory of emotivism states that
a) all emotions in morals are bad. b) emotions in morality must be balanced with reason. c) moral propositions only express feelings. d) we should get back in touch with our emotions.
Arguments about values include disagreements about
attitude, which are difficult to reconcile. Scientific methods are not always successful in obtaining an agreement in attitudes.
What will be an ideal response?