What did the United States Supreme Court state in Mapp v. Ohio?
A. Any information derived from illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible.
B. Illegally derived evidence is admissible as long as excluding the evidence would not deter unlawful police conduct.
C. The case adopted the English and Canadian exclusionary rules.
D. The exclusionary rule seeks to deter unlawful police conduct.
Answer: D
You might also like to view...
Which of the following are responses to counter the threat of violence and criminal victimization?
a. Proactive response to crime b. Reactive response to crime c. Proactive and reactive responses to crime d. Civil justice
Because Kant viewed adult humans as autonomous ______ he concluded that we cannot rely on religion, government or others to tell us what is right.
Fill in the blank(s) with the appropriate word(s).
Team policing and community policing can share the following characteristics except:
a. A neighborhood focus b. Decentralized decision making c. Community input d. Centralized decision making
For most states looking to cut correction costs, the focus has been on incarceration, or the reduction of inmate populations
a. True b. False Indicate whether the statement is true or false