One danger of jury nullification—that both Abramson and Haynie acknowledge as a
danger—is that through jury nullification, juries might
a. indulge in feelings of resentment against the wealthy and privileged.
b. become arrogant and self-serving.
c. refuse to convict those who commit crimes against minorities.
d. be abolished altogether, as the public becomes increasingly upset with jury
verdicts.
e. be difficult to fill, as more people refuse to serve on juries.
c
You might also like to view...
INSTRUCTIONS: In each problem below you are given a statement, its truth value in parentheses, and a new statement. You must determine how the new statement is related to the given statement and determine the truth value of the new statement. Adopt the Aristotelian standpoint and assume that 'A' and 'B' denote things that actually exist. Some non-A are B. (F) Some non-B are A
A) Contraposition. (Und.) B) Obversion. (F) C) Conversion. (T) D) Contraposition. (F) E) Conversion. (F)
Employee Rights and the Doctrine of at Will Employment (David R. Hiley)
What would be the main claim and supporting arguments on this?
Opinions are unsupported beliefs and must always be rejected
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Nozick believes that whether a distribution is just depends upon how it came about
Indicate whether the statement is true or false