Why might ethics, as it involves the use of force, be different in international versus domestic politics when it comes to judging the actions of national leaders?
a. because state leaders can generally ignore with impunity international treaties and understandings about the use of force, but cannot consistently ignore domestic law and expectations
b. because the actions of state leaders may be seen in a different light from state to state, or culture to culture
c. because protection of state interests is of central importance to state leaders who wish to stay in power, and order is often taken for granted domestically, leaving more room for discussion of justice
d. because national leaders who try to do the ethically or morally right thing at the international level nearly always end up paying for it
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
Why is the creation of political parties necessary in a representative democracy?
A. They are necessary mechanisms to ensure that the individuals we choose to represent us are responsive and responsible. B. They are necessary to ensure order in a democracy; otherwise anarchy would exist. C. They provide elected officials with support and legal strength when confronted by corrupt special interest groups. D. They are necessary to maintain balance and order and to prevent any single person from gaining too much strength politically.
In 2006, is now characterized as an totalitarian-statist regime because of its weak protection of civil liberties and political rights
a. Poland b. Russia c. Germany d. both a and b
Political culture includes a sense of national identity, attitudes about governmental performance, and knowledge and attitudes about the political decision-making process
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
What was President Obama’s condition for involving the United States in the threat posed in Iraq by the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria?
What will be an ideal response?