In the landmark decision in Thurman v. City of Torrington, 595 F.Supp. 1521, (D.Conn. 1984), the court decided that:
A. The City of Torrington could not be sued in a spousal abuse case.
B. The plaintiff had no right to protection, despite a restraining order.
C. The City of Torrington could be sued for failing to provide the plaintiff protection.
D. The plaintiff's spouse had not committed spousal abuse.
Answer: C
You might also like to view...
Under federal law, a sale is considered an installment sale if at least one payment under the contract is made after the close of the taxable year of sale.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
Under ________, a bar owner or bartender may be held liable for injuries caused by a person who became intoxicated while drinking at the bar or who was already intoxicated when served by the bartender.?
A. dram shop acts? B. ?Good Samaritan statutes C. ?bar owner liability acts D. ?defamation acts
5. Moore, W., Constitutional Rights and Powers of the People. Princeton University Press, 1996.
What will be an ideal response?
Connie, an invalid who will be remaining in the marital home, is seeking support to meet financial obligations, and will most likely make:
A. A motion for guardianship. B. A motion to freeze assets. C. A motion for use of the motor vehicle. D. A motion for alimony.