Andy leases to Burgertown Franchise Corporation a 10,000 square-foot building under a written lease with a twenty-year term, rent payable annually. The lease includes a clause stating that Burgertown is responsible for making all necessary repairs, including rebuilding the structure after its destruction by any cause beyond Andy's control. The lease does not include a clause concerning its assignment. One day after the tenth rental payment, Burgertown, without Andy's knowledge or consent, assigns its interest in the lease to Chicken Hut Restaurants, Inc. Meanwhile, Andy dies and Dotty inherits Andy's interest in the building. Without the knowledge or consent of either Burgertown or Chicken Hut, Dotty sells the building to Earnest Investments, Inc. The next month, the building is destroyed
in the flood of a nearby river. Burgertown rebuilds it and files a suit against Earnest for the expense. Earnest responds that the lease has terminated. Is Earnest correct? If so, when did the lease terminate? If not, is Earnest liable for the cost of rebuilding the structure? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
Earnest is not correct. The lease has not terminated. Absent a provision in the lease to the contrary, its assignment is not prohibited, even without the consent of the landlord. The death of a landlord does not terminate a lease, unlike some other contracts. The owner's sale of leased premises to a third party does not terminate a lease, even without the consent of the tenant. Normally, the destruction of rental property would terminate a lease, but this commercial lease contained, as do many long-term commercial leases, a clause that required the tenant to rebuild the structure if it was destroyed by a cause beyond the landlord's control, which includes a flood. Such clauses are legally binding. Thus, none of these events¾Burgertown's assignment of the lease to Chicken Hut, Andy's death, Dotty's sale of the property to Earnest, or the destruction of the building in a flood¾terminated this lease. Although there may be a reduction in the amount of rent Burgertown, who remains liable despite the assignment, must pay while the premises are being rebuilt. Earnest is not liable for the cost of rebuilding the structure. Again, the lease required the tenant to rebuild the destroyed structure at the tenant's expense.
You might also like to view...
One important goal of a buffer is to
A) delay stating the bad news. B) establish common ground with your reader. C) make your reader wonder what the message is about. D) divert the reader's attention to a more pleasant subject. E) shift the blame to the reader or a third party.
In the advertising process, who are the creatives?
What will be an ideal response?
An egoist is trying to solve an ethical problem at work but finds he cannot reach an agreement or an acceptable solution by prioritizing only his own interests. As he tries to expand his thinking on this issue, what next mental step is he most likely to take?
a. trying to make his own behavior as virtuous as possible b. wondering how most stakeholders will be affected by the problem c. considering the interests of his immediate coworkers and perhaps his supervisor d. considering how to maximize the benefit for the most number of people
You must include a photograph on your résumé
Indicate whether the statement is true or false