Discuss the ethical dilemmas that resulted from Stanley Milgram's obedience research. Do you think that the ends justified the means in this case? Does the fact that nobody was really physically shocked make a difference? What if you wanted to conduct a replication of the experiment but wanted to actually administer shocks? Do you think that the findings would change regarding the obedience of the participants?
What will be an ideal response?
You might also like to view...
Functional fixedness refers to
a. continued use of problem-solving strategies that have worked in the past. b. arriving at a particularly insightful solution to a problem. c. focusing on information that is irrelevant to the solution of the problem. d. the tendency tosee an items only in terms of its most common use.
The series of eye fixations that we perceive as visual sensations seem continuous, or stream like, because of _____
A) short-term memory B) saccadic eye movements C) sensory memory D) serial-position effect
An absence of the cochlea will result in _____
Fill in the blank with correct word
Individuals who have damage to the ______ make very poor risky decisions in gambling.
A. entorhinal cortex B. amygdala C. lateral geniculate nucleus D. prefrontal cortex