The following argument is valid: "If it is raining outside, then the streets must be wet. The streets are wet. Therefore, it must be raining outside."
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
False
This is the formal fallacy known as affirming the consequent. To see this argument is invalid, consider this. If the first premise is true, then the fact that it is raining outside guarantees that the streets are wet. But even so, there might be other ways that the street might have become wet. (A fire hydrant might have malfunctioned.)
You might also like to view...
Daoists undertake individual spiritual practices for
a. complying with the requirements to enter samsara. b. the purpose of fulfilling doctrinal obligations. c. health and happiness. d. the sake of inner transformation and perhaps immortality.
Plato believed that he could give the best lecture on an ideal society
Indicate whether this statement is true or false.
The Jain view of knowledge is __________
a. agnostic b. multiplism c. prima facie d. totally accessible to the human mind e. a zero-sum game
Thomson argues that the right to life does not entail the right to use another
person’s body. What example does she use to argue this point?
e. The tiny child growing inside the house f. Henry Fonda g. Person?seeds h. Jones, Smith and the Coat