Compare the time complexities of Dijkstra’s shortest path algorithm modified for All Pair Shortest Path finding and Floyd’s all pair shortest path algorithm.
What will be an ideal response?
Asymptotically, they both have the same complexity of O(N3) for dense graphs. In practice,
Floyd’s algorithm runs faster in finite sized graphs as its implementation can be done more
efficient in dense graphs. However, for sparse graphs, repeated Dijkstra’s algorithm can be implemented with fibonacci heaps resulting in a time complexity of O(N2 log N) which is better than Floyd’s algorithm.
You might also like to view...
Which of the following statements doubles the value stored in answer?
A) answer += 2; B) answer *= 2; C) answer = answer * 2; D) All three of the above E) Both B and C, but not A
Formulas cannot include more than two functions.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
The output of the Java code, assuming that all variables are properly declared, is 32.num = 10;while (num <= 32) num = num + 5;System.out.println(num);
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
public static void ExchangeContents (ref T value1, ref T value2) { T temp; temp = value1; value1 = value2; value2 = temp; } ? ?Which of the following is TRUE regarding the above segment of code?
A. ?The segment of code is defining a generic method. B. ?T is a placeholder for the data type. C. ?Data in the memory locations value1 and value2 are swapped. D. ?All of the above