Discuss the purpose of the Paris Accord and its relationship to the United States.
What will be an ideal response?
In 2015, 195 countries entered into theParis Accord, an agreement to prevent climate change by reducing GHGs.The Accord does not set specific standards. Instead, each country establishes its own goals and there are no penalties for countries that set low goals or who fail toachieve their set targets.However, all countries have pledged to meet every five years to report the results of their emissions programs and to issue more aggressive plans.?Historically, the United States has produced more total GHGs than any other country. In 2015, in response to the Paris Accord, the United States committed to cutting its GHG emissions and issued CAA regulations to implement this goal. In 2017, the Trump Administration overturned the regulations and withdrew from the Paris Accord. However, more than 1,200 mayors, governors, and business leaders in the United States have promised to continue efforts to meet the Paris Accord standards.
You might also like to view...
Which statement is true about standard hour plans?
A. They succeed only for employees who are not motivated by money. B. They encourage employees to work as fast as they can. C. In terms of their pros and cons, they are very different from piecework plans. D. They encourage employees to focus exclusively on customer service. E. They encourage employees to focus mainly on quality.
The Securities and Exchange Commission was intended to be a "watchdog" agency that would ensure full disclosure of material information to the investing public
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
An easy-to-navigate website with on-demand 24/7 access to customer service representatives via chats, phone contact, or responsive e-mail communications is an example of a positive customer point of contact.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)
In Lewis v. Heartland Inns of America, L.L.C., where Lewis sued for violation of her Title VII rights, contending that she was fired for not conforming to sex stereotypes and in retaliation for opposing discriminatory practices, the appeals court held that:
a. Heartland's proffered reason for Lewis's termination was pretextual and the district court's ruling forHeartland should be reversed b. Heartland's proffered reason for Lewis's termination was not pretextual and the district court's ruling againstHeartland should be reversed c. Heartland's proffered reason for Lewis's termination was not pretextual and the district court's ruling forHeartland should be reversed d. Heartland's proffered reason for Lewis's termination was sufficient explanation for her termination e. Lewis could not sue for sex discrimination since the person who fired her was also a woman