In the Berardi v. Meadowbrook Mall Company case, the court found:
a. plaintiffs must produce subjective evidence of their duress to win a case of economic duress.
b. duress is readily accepted by the courts as a reason to avoid a contract.
c. economic duress must leave the plaintiff no reasonable alternative but to acquiesce to the terms of the contract.
d. plaintiffs who prove economic duress may void the transaction, and this is their complete remedy.
c
You might also like to view...
To bring a claim for disparate-treatment discrimination, the complainant must prove that ________
A) he or she is disabled B) he or she was rejected due to over-qualification C) he or she belongs to a Title VII protected class D) he or she is covered by Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
The EMV approach and Utility theory always result in the same choice of alternatives
Indicate whether the statement is true or false
Explain the three major categories of the Social Security system
Primary activities of the value chain provide infrastructure such as procurement, information technology, human resources, and accounting.
Answer the following statement true (T) or false (F)