What are some of the criticisms of the CAN-SPAM Act. Do you agree with these criticisms? Why or why not?
What will be an ideal response?
A good answer will include the criticisms included in the text, such as:
a. The Act actually helps spammers by laying out exactly how to send spam within the rules, such as the “opt-out” clause.
b. A preemption clause in the Act of some state laws that are more rigorous than the federal Act may not be enforceable.
c. Law enforcement has to deal with jurisdictional issues. The main question is whether the United States has authority if the spammer operates from another country.
You might also like to view...
The first thing a crime scene investigator should do when encountering computer forensic evidence is:
a. Unplug every device from the CPU to preserve the hard disk drive. b. Procure a warrant to search. c. Remove the system to the laboratory for processing. d. Document the scene.
Congress can identify problems by:
a. trigger events. b. media coverage. c. constituents. d. interest groups. e. all of the above.
Punishing a person with an increased punishment after the individual commits a crime is forbidden because it is__________
Fill in the blank(s) with correct word
In light of the budgetary pressures and constraints faced by all levels of government, how can increased expenditure on prison treatment and rehabilitation programs be justified to the tax-paying public?
What will be an ideal response?