Studies have shown that political action committees (PACs) contribute disproportionately to incumbent candidates. Why do PACs pursue this strategy in their campaign contributions? Are there any potential drawbacks?
Answer:
An ideal response will:
1. Explain that PACs are strategic in how they invest their funds; they want to get the most impact out of their contributions.
2. Note that incumbent candidates are more likely to win, so groups that donate to PACs are more likely to gain access to elected officials after the election.
3. Explain one or more drawbacks to this strategy, including the possibility that the challenger will win and groups will not have the same type of access to the newly elected officials.
You might also like to view...
The family, popular culture, and schools all serve as important agents of __________
Fill in the blanks with correct word
Which statement best characterizes the role of the Internet as a source of news?
a. The Internet is the primary news source for most Americans today. b. During the 2009–2010 election cycle, about 75 percent of Americans reported that they depended on the Internet as their main source for news about the campaigns. c. The Internet rivals television news as the major source of political information for most Americans. d. American reliance on Internet news sources has increased exponentially.
According to the text, Americans' knowledge of politics is
A. very good. B. usually up on current events, but nothing else. C. woefully ignorant. D. good about the workings of the government, but not current office holders or events. E. better at the local level.
Jack Holloway has recently been appointed as governor of Texas. He wants to appoint all the staff. What would limit this opportunity for him?
What will be an ideal response?