Briefly describe Lau v. Nichols, its argument, and the court ruling.
What will be an ideal response?
Ans: Answers to this question will vary but should include elements of the following: Lau v. Nichols is a Supreme Court case brought forward on behalf of Chinese American students living in San Francisco. The plaintiffs argued that ELLs were receiving an inferior education, thereby violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 that bans discrimination based on race, color, or national origin. In 1974, the Supreme Court ruled in the students’ favor guaranteeing the rights of English language learning students.
You might also like to view...
Taking a cake and dividing it into 6 equal slices is a situation represented by:
a. unit partitioned into equal-size parts. b. set partitioned into equal-size groups. c. expression of ratios. d. indicated division.
Teachers often have stereotypes or depressed expectations for poor and minority students due to:
a. negative experiences with these cultural groups. b. negative perceptions passed down by the classroom teachers with whom they work. c. lack of meaningful exposure to these cultural groups. d. research studies shared in teacher education programs.
Understanding the neuronal, or hardware, activity involved in information processing occurs at which level?
a. computational level b. algorithmic level c. implementation level d. none of the above
To identify diversity in the classroom to make instructional decisions, one may use a _____.
a. strategic School profile b. cultural Awareness profile c. classroom demographic profile d. cultural Strategic plan