Explain what two conflicting norms operated in Stanley Milgram's classic obedience experiments. Also explain why one norm was more likely to be obeyed than the other
What will be an ideal response?
Answer: Participants were caught between two conflicting norms; on one hand, it is wrong to inflict needless pain on an undeserving victim, and on the other hand, it is right to obey authority figures. At the beginning of the experiment—when shocks were mild and the learner did not complain or fall silent—it was relatively easy to follow the "obey authority" norm. As the learner's pain and protests grew stronger, it became hard to abandon that norm for the alternative "Do no harm" norm. First, the experiment was fast-paced (participants didn't have time to think about their values and the other norm) and second, participants were asked to deliver shocks in small increments (which made each previous shock a kind of justification for subsequent shocks).
You might also like to view...
Disorders characterized by disruptions in mood are known as __________ disorders.
A. conversion B. somatoform C. depressive D. dissociative
The initial step in the cascade model of substance abuse involves
a. exposure to harsh parenting. b. development of conduct problems. c. being a child who is at risk due to a difficult temperament. d. being born into a family environment characterized by poverty and substance abuse.
The Harvard Committee's criteria (1968) on determination of death apply to
a. all persons who are dying b. persons involved in automobile accidents c. individuals in an irreversible coma d. individuals who have suffered serious trauma e. none of these
As their preferred methods of conflict resolution, participants from the United States preferred to save the "face" of their opponents
Indicate whether the statement is true or false.